At 17:53 Uhr +0100 24.11.1998, Shigeki Uno wrote:

>What you're going to say is that xemacs is too heavy on macbsd platform,
>isn't it ?  It's smooth on Linux & FreeBSD which work on PC/AT & its close.

Again, this gives a wrong impression. Once it's up, XEmacs is very workable
on my Q700, and acceptable on the IIci (although I tend to use vi on the
latter for one line changes). Using "editclient.sh" cuts down most of the
annoyingly long startup time.

>But, xemacs is very cool!!

It is, isn't it?  =8)

	hauke



--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)