Subject: Re: Dyna Board Ethernet Probs
To: port-mac68k <port-mac68k@netbsd.org>
From: Christopher P. Gill <cpg@scs.howard.edu>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 06/08/1999 14:56:30
I'd thought that my Dayna Ethernet card was working under NetBSD, but I
was wrong. I'd used:
/sbin/ping -v -L -c 5 bouncer
from the same machine to test it. I thought that this would prevent
loopback sucesses from from being reported, but apparently not. Although
this reports a success, I now realize that can't ping that interface from
any other machine, and no inet or atalk services are visible from the
network. Pinging *out* from that interface:
/sbin/ping -v -c 5 -I bouncer www.netbsd.org
gives me 100% packet loss. The activity light on the transceiver on the
card doesn't even blink.
On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Christopher P. Gill wrote:
> Here's more information than anyone probably needs, from different
> places on the card:
>
> ETHERPORT IINL, EXCELAN, S/N 152502, Copyright 1989
> DP8390CN, NS32490CN
> SYNOPTICS, 104-001-E, 8909
> P/N: 9800115-00 REV: A
> D/C: 89343
> 1420059-00 REV A
> My /var/run/dmesg.boot still reports:
>
> ae0 at nubus0 slot d: EtherPort IIN, 16KB memory
> ae0: Ethernet address <yadda yadda yada>
I've set up netatalk to use that interface too.
ifconfig now gives me:
ae0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
media: Ethernet manual
inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
atalk 65280.58 range 0-65534 phase 2 broadcast 65280.58
> FWIW, I'm still using the generic kernel, and my EtherNIC hasn't moved
> from slot D.
>
> After getting it working with MacOS, I telnetted in (on
> sn0) from my PPC machine to bring up the ae0 interface, with:
>
> # ifconfig ae0 inet bouncer netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> bouncer is defined in my /etc/hosts file as:
>
> 192.168.1.1 bouncer bouncer.homenet.net
>
> This worked for me. No kernel hysterics resulted. I can 'ping bouncer'
> with no problems. Note that I am not using "bouncer" in my rc.conf (or
> /etc/myname). Once I get everthing else working (i.e., IP-NAT), I'll
> probably do that. Right now, *both* interfaces are hooked into ports on
> my hub.
This is really bugging me. Does anyone have any hints or tips? Is there
some way I could help to get this working sometime? Note that I'm no
kernel hacker.
/*======================================================================
"Don't die wondering..." http://www.cldc.howard.edu/~cpg
email: cpg@scs.howard.edu
chris out- Christopher P. Gill
peace. C.L.D.C. Senior System Operator (Ret.)
======================================================================*/