Subject: heavy packages+solution?!
To: Steve Revilak <revilak@umbsky.cc.umb.edu>
From: T@W <lsp93@xs4all.nl>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 07/22/1999 22:19:42
Steve Revilak wrote:
>/The solution was to use the -I option. Guess something is broken in the
>script.
>
>Glad it worked out.
>
>Now to statify my curiosity of what "-I" does...
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>Steve Revilak
>revilak@umbsky.cc.umb.edu
Hi Steve,
here is an excerpt from "man pkg_add"
>
> -I If an installation script exists for a given package, do not exe-
> cute it.
>
> -n Don't actually install a package, just report the steps that
> would be taken if it was.
>
> -R Do not record the installation of a package. This means that you
> cannot deinstall it later, so only use this option if you know
> what you are doing!
>
> -f Force installation to proceed even if prerequisite packages are
> not installed or the requirements script fails. Although pkg_add
> will still try to find and auto-install missing prerequisite
> packages, a failure to find one will not be fatal.
and the solution for:
/2.so maybe i solve the problem by reinstalling the sets (not for the first
/time)
/but then i wonder how to (over)install the most proper way without
/overwriting changed or added files and/or directories:
/a. with the installer?
/b.pax -zrvpe -f /path/to/setname.tgz
I've chosen for pax -zrvupe -f /path/to/setname.tgz
the -u option leaves doesn't overwrite newer files.
Also the -k option seems the option not ot overwrite existing files at all.
But now a 3rd and 4th problem cropped up:
3.pkgsrc.tgz is a "corrupt inode killer"
4.so i went to the ftp.nebsd.server and wanted to enter the 1.4 section.
Permission denied? What the f*ck goes on there?
The whole hierarchy seems to be shuffled or partly disappeared.
Did i enter at an inconvenient time? Were they having 'sup'per?
Later,
T@W