On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, T@W wrote:

> Allan wrote:
> >Can you provide more details on the "fpu_add error"?  I've been pretty
> >busy and must have missed discussion on this.
> 
> nope not much more.
> I type top and it goes into the debug which gives the fpu_add error as cause.
> Ps shows the sleepy list with top on top
> And that's pretty much it.
> You haven't missed the discussion because, afaik, there wasn't one yet.
> Thanks though.

When it does this, type

t

which will give a stack trace. Please write down the function names (you
don't need to write down the parts in parentheses).

Take care,

Bill