Subject: Re: Quadra memory check
To: Roger Brown <rogerhb@xtra.co.nz>
From: David A. Gatwood <dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 07/31/2000 23:30:15
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Roger Brown wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Well done indeed!
>
> What distribution would I need to run this, presumably some version of
> mklinux and some booter?
MkLinux pre-R1 should work, with the MkLinux booter (whatever the latest
version).
> If you could tell me which version of booter to use, I could see how far the
> thing gets without a hardrive on a Performa 6200. (I can't trash my MacOS
> IDE just yet...)
Heheheh. Worth noting, I already have one report of the thing missing a
slot interrupt (and thus losing IDE suddenly and relatively unfixably).
So there's a really obnoxious issue left there, but I think I know how to
fix it.
> What about input/output (how do I get stuff into the thing?)
Keyboard/video works, serial might work (untested so far... that's on my
list this weekend).
> Does the serial(printer) port work for PPP or SLIP?
>
> Earlier you said there was not much chance of getting a Communications Slot
> Ethernet card supported due to a limitation of the mach kernel.
Same reason as NuBus ethernet cards, yeah. Memory allocation issue.
Though when I look at it, there might be a way, it would just be a pain in
the backside.
> I know it would run like a dog, but has anybody seriously considered a
> LocalTalk driver? By run like a dog I mean I realise it would have to
> disable interrupts while receiving any packet, (or, rather, that is what
> current Macs do).
I don't think anyone has tried....
> If PPP or SLIP worked I could use a NetBSD as a gateway/router to ethernet
> (I presume).
Yeah.
David
>
> ----------
> >From: "David A. Gatwood" <dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org>
> >To: Tony Mantler <nicoya@apia.dhs.org>
> >Cc: port-mac68k@netbsd.org
> >Subject: Re: Re[2[: Quadra memory check
> >Date: Mon, Jul 31, 2000, 6:58 pm
> >
>
> >On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, David A. Gatwood wrote:
> >
> >> No worries. The int was coming from F108. I think I can deal with that.
> >> :-) Thanks again!
> >
> >It WWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOORRRRRRKKKKKKKKSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!!!!!!
> >
> >Hmmm.... Now to take out all these comments so I can do _real_ testing
> >and see just how well it does work. Looks like MkLinux is about to
> >support another entire class of PowerMac. :-)
> >
> >Thanks again.
> >
> >
> >Later,
> >David
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >A brief Haiku:
> >
> >Microsoft is bad.
> >It seems secure at first glance.
> >Then you read your mail.
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A brief Haiku:
Microsoft is bad.
It seems secure at first glance.
Then you read your mail.