Subject: Re: Normal Memory Usage?
To: brendan burns <bburns@wso.williams.edu>
From: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 03/28/2001 12:05:36
	Are you running a -current kernel? There was a recent bugfix that
	fixed a memory reporting error...

		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --


On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, brendan burns wrote:

> Folks, doing a "top" recently I noticed the following:
>
> load averages:  1.46,  2.20,  1.87    23:59:30
> 27 processes:  26 sleeping, 1 on processor
>
> Memory: 19M Act, 10M Inact, 288K Wired, 1460K Free, 5488K Swap, 44M Swap
> free
>
>
>   PID USERNAME PRI NICE   SIZE   RES STATE     TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
>   569 root      33    0   132K  680K onproc    0:00 16.00%  0.78% top
>   396 root       2    0   280K  408K sleep     0:29  0.29%  0.29% sshd
>   401 root      10    0   560K  672K sleep     0:03  0.22%  0.05% bash
>   192 root       2    0   244K    0K sleep     0:58  0.00%  0.00% <sshd>
>   398 root      18    0   408K    0K sleep     0:01  0.00%  0.00% <csh>
>    98 root       2    0    92K  312K sleep     0:01  0.00%  0.00% syslogd
>   407 root       2    0   896K  244K sleep     0:01  0.00%  0.00% httpd
>   197 root      18    0  4096M    0K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% <inetd>
>   200 root      10    0  4096M  256K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% cron
>   397 brendan   10    0   532K    0K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% <bash>
>     1 root      10    0   296K    0K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% <init>
>   202 root       3    0    48K    0K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% <getty>
>   458 pgsql      2    0  1380K  476K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% postgres
>   146 root       2    0  4096M  172K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% nfsd
>   147 root       2    0  4096M  172K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% nfsd
>   145 root       2    0  4096M  172K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% nfsd
>   144 root       2    0  4096M  172K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% nfsd
>   132 root       2    0  4096M    0K sleep     0:00  0.00%  0.00% <mountd>
>
> Notice that a) there are four nfsds running and they as well as inetd and
> cron each have 4096M of memory (very little of which they are using)  Is
> this normal?  Not that "top" lists avail memory as 1460k.  This is on a
> Quadra 650 (040) with 40 megs of ram...
>
> Thanks,
> Brendan
>
>