Hi,
a 99% built /usr/src tree for m68k is taking 800 meg right
now.  I'm playing around with getting real software floating 
point into libc.

The resulting build areas are taking just shy of 150
meg or so, so even 1 gig might be a bit tight.  This is
building mac68k on macppc.

cheers

bruce


"Mark E. Perkins" <perkinsm@bway.net> wrote:
> I'm putting together a 1.6 system for testing and fiddling with
> NetBSD/mac68k (currently, I have 1.5.4_ALPHA on other machines) and
> want to get the file system sizes about right (made them too small the
> first time).
> 
> I see that the size of the source tree for 1.6 is about 520MB compared
> to about 330MB for 1.5.4 (both figures are for clean source trees).
> After building 1.5.4, my /usr/src file system increased by about 200MB
> (to 530MB). Can I assume that building a 1.6 system will have
> comparable requirements, perhaps on a percentage basis? In particular,
> will a 900MB partition leave enough headroom or should I go for a full
> GB? I'm using a 2GB drive with 20MB off the top for MacOS. I'd also
> like to have enough space on the drive for a pkgsrc partition to build
> a couple of essential (for me) tools to make fiddling easier (e.g.,
> bash, emacs, sudo, a few others), so don't want to be too extravagant
> with /usr/src.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark