Subject: Re: more partitions
To: Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net>
From: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 02/13/2004 19:34:41
At 8:44 Uhr -0600 13.2.2004, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
>There are other reasons besides speed. It makes it possible to set
>policies for backups, quotas, and permissions.

Yep. Think "NFS".

In short, single-partition setups are fine for single-user workstation use;
on a server machine, you want multiple partitions.

>When you factor in the
>fact that most drives on NetBSD/mac68k hosts have HFS partitions too,
>the current maximum of six useful partitions is very limiting. I think
>we should follow the lead of i386 and other ports, and do what it
>takes to permit up to sixteen.

Strongly seconded.

	hauke


--
/~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ /    No HTML/RTF in email
 X     No Word docs in email
/ \  Respect for open standards