At 2:35 PM +0000 4/1/04, Bruce O'Neel wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks.  The problem with my fixes is that one builds two sets of binaries.
>
>In one case you build the normal binaries with inline f instructions.
>In the other case you build them using -msoft-float to gcc and you have
>no f instructions.

Right, but it would be beneficial for all if you *could* build those 
2 sets of binaries...without your patches, will just doing an 
-msoft-float build actually build a working non-fp set? IIUC, your 
patches allow the msoft-float to work, they don't force it. So there 
would be no downside to them being included in the general release 
(you just don't build with -msoft-float for the mainstream distro).

Frederick was suggesting that you get the source code changes 
committed, not that we commit to your (non-fp) build type as the main 
one.

Mike
-- 
Bikers don't *DO* taglines.