M L Riechers wrote:

> Ah, HAVE GENERIC SOFT INTERRUPTS.  Implemented for the mac mace by
> some sort of wrapper.  One failure mode of which could be exactly what
> I saw -- lots of dropped packets.
> 
> So.  1. Anyone still seeing difficulties with mc0?  On later editions
>         of NetBSD?  Anyone seeing success with 2.0?

hmm, no. asI already wrote, I have problems on both tsunami and kansas
boards. It is extremely sluggish with 1.6.2 kernel and unusable with 2.0
kernels. Never tried 1.6KZ to be honest.

-R