Izumi Tsutsui wrote:

>In article <20051125140640.GA25276@thoreau.thistledown.com.au>
>simonb@wasabisystems.com wrote:
>
>  
>
>>(which uses bus_space functions in it's ethernet driver) before took:
>>
>>    350.520u 44.351s 6:58.84 94.2%  0+0k 0+0io 185pf+0w
>>    349.663u 44.458s 6:59.13 94.0%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
>>    349.797u 44.109s 6:56.85 94.4%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
>>
>>and after took:
>>
>>    351.099u 44.318s 6:58.40 94.5%  0+0k 0+0io 112pf+0w
>>    351.480u 43.919s 6:57.58 94.6%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
>>    351.205u 44.174s 6:54.45 95.3%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
>>
>>So we've saved about 35kB of text for one kernel, about 12kB for another
>>and any performance changes are statistical noise.
>>    
>>
>
>The %U and %P look a bit different? (just curious :-)
>
>  
>
>>I can't think of a reason not to apply this patch.  Can anyone else?
>>    
>>
>
>It's better to handle PR port-mips/31910 first?
>(I have not check it yet though)
>  
>
Yes, please!  (Alternatively, I can try to rework that so that it uses
functions instead of macros.)

    -- Garrett

>---
>Izumi Tsutsui
>  
>


-- 
Garrett D'Amore                          http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/
Sr. Staff Engineer          Extending the Power of 64-bit UNIX Computing
Tadpole Computer, Inc.                             Phone: (951) 325-2134