Port-mips archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Does umimplemnted insn emulation work in -current?
I wrote:
> > > - lw a0, 0(a2) # a0 = coproc instruction
> > > + lw a0, 4(a2) # a0 = coproc instruction
> :
> > I'll revert the above line in a few days if there is no objection.
>
> The attached patch also fixes PR 35326 (FPU siginfo),
One more regression in fp.S:
Index: mips/fp.S
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/mips/mips/fp.S,v
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -p -r1.37 fp.S
--- mips/fp.S 14 Dec 2009 00:46:06 -0000 1.37
+++ mips/fp.S 29 Jan 2011 01:24:36 -0000
@@ -2529,6 +2532,8 @@ inexact_nobias_d:
PTR_L v0, L_PCB(MIPS_CURLWP) # get pcb of current process
#nop
INT_S a2, PCB_FPREGS+FRAME_FSR(v0)
+#else
+ ctc1 a2, MIPS_FPU_CSR # save exceptions
#endif
b done
Now all tests in src/tests/lib/libc/ieeefp are passed
on R4400 ews4800mips and R5000 sgimips.
As I noted in PR 35326, it looks FP underflow in mul.s and mul.d
instructions triggers MIPS_FPU_EXCEPTION_UNIMPL instead of
MIPS_FPU_EXCEPTION_UNDERFLOW, and that's the reason why
ieeefp tests are affected by MachEmulateFP() implementation
even on machines that have the real FP unit.
(at least on R4400/R5000/Rm5230)
---
Izumi Tsutsui
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index