Re: Starting NetBSD/mips64 kernel up and Userland Questions

["Naruaki.Etomi" <nullnilaki%gmail.com@localhost>]

Hello,
Thank you everyone.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Thorpe,

>Our 64-bit MIPS platforms use n32 binaries because, as I recall,
>it was determined to perform better.
I understood.

I built mips64 userland and tried it!

[  11.4114064] WARNING: clock lost 8764 days
[  11.4595812] WARNING: using filesystem time
[  11.5088293] WARNING: CHECK AND RESET THE DATE!
[  11.6822271] panic: init died (signal 0, exit 1)
[  11.7426656] cpu0: Begin traceback...
[  11.7876988] pid -2136376384 not found
[  11.8316821] cpu0: End traceback...
[  11.8725321] kernel: breakpoint trap
Stopped in pid 1.1 (init) at    ffffffff80073b2c:       jr      ra
                bdslot: nop
db> tr
0xffffffff80a97be0: 0+ffffffff80073b2c (0,ff00,0,ffffffff807c9380) ra 0 sz 0
User-level: pid 1.1

Well, things are not going well.
Do you have any advice on where to investigate?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Michael,

It has been a long time since I last contacted you.

>Nice! Now I really need to get a new power supply for my O2...

I know the feeling.
My power supply too broke and replace.

>We default to N32 userlands on all mips64 - as in 64bit registers etc.
>enabled but 32bit address space.
>Not sure they work properly, but gcc -mabi=64 ... is probably what
>you're looking for.

Thank you for your advice!

>Please commit, even if it only partially works, so other people can
>work on it as well ( mostly referring to myself, I have an Octane
>here... )

I understood.
Clean up my patch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Maya,

>We can't run dynamically linked n64 binaries, I doubt anyone fixed PR
>52857.

Thank you for your advice!

-- 
Naruaki Etomi
nullnilaki%gmail.com@localhost