Subject: Re: NeXT formatted disks (was Re: next68k port status?)
To: Darrin B. Jewell <dbj@NetBSD.org>
From: Michael Wolfson <michael@nosflow.com>
List: port-next68k
Date: 10/17/2003 11:23:14
On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 08:12 AM, Darrin B. Jewell wrote:
> Well, in order to separate this away from the device specific issues
> regarding how to the disk device itself is indexed, you can run dumpfs
> on the filesystem itself and look at the superblock.
So, if I understand you right, then the output of dumpfs does indeed
show that NS 3.3 creates file systems with a sector size of 1024 bytes.
I just checked using dumpfs on my system with SCSI disks using 512
byte physical sectors. Bummer.
magic 11954 time Sun Oct 17 09:12:43 1999
sblkno 16 cblkno 24 iblkno 32 dblkno 168
sbsize 2048 cgsize 2048 cgoffset 72 cgmask 0xfffffffc
ncg 224 size 1001472 blocks 967404
bsize 8192 shift 13 mask 0xffffe000
fsize 1024 shift 10 mask 0xfffffc00
frag 8 shift 3 fsbtodb 0
minfree 10% maxbpg 256 optim time
maxcontig 1 rotdelay 4ms rps 60
csaddr 168 cssize 4096 shift 9 mask 0xfffffe00
ntrak 4 nsect 70 spc 280 ncyl 3577
cpg 16 bpg 560 fpg 4480 ipg 1088
nindir 2048 inopb 64 nspf 1
nbfree 112198 ndir 608 nifree 239782 nffree 1027
cgrotor 192 fmod 0 ronly 0 state 1
-- MW