Subject: Re: Well, I *wanted* to say that my pc532 lived!
To: Jordan K. Hubbard <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
From: Karl Swartz <kls@ohare.chicago.com>
List: port-pc532
Date: 10/11/1995 03:59:33
> You bet! One of the few machines that actually worked around
> National's bug list and produced a functioning machine. I still
> shudder to think of those early companies (like the poor folks who
> produced the PERQ) who were killed by that same bug list. SIGH!
That same bug list didn't kill the PERQ -- the PERQ never dreamed of
anything as aesthetically pleasing as a 32000-series instruction set.
It had a CPU built up from AMD 2901 4-bit ALU slices, with microcode
(at least for POS and Accent) that gave it a P-code like instruction
set called Q-code.
What killed it was a horrible and utterly proprietary design, along
with equally awful system software. (I once saw PERQ translated as
Poorly Engineered and Remiss in Quality, which pretty much sums it
up.)
--
Karl Swartz |Home kls@chicago.com
|Work kls@slac.stanford.edu
|WWW http://www.chicago.com/~kls/
Moderator of sci.aeronautics.airliners -- Unix/network work pays the bills