Subject: Re: How to add swap file -- Re: Network slowness
To: Toru Nishimura <nisimura@is.aist-nara.ac.jp>
From: Adam Fritzler <afritz@iname.com>
List: port-pmax
Date: 01/12/1998 21:36:36
At 09:54 AM 1/13/98 +0900, you wrote:
>In article<199801120425.XAA23727@ren.globecomm.net>
>How much did you reserve swap space? MIPS architecture requires much
>RAM than loosy CISC decendent. NetBSD allows you to add swap space as
I've got 132mb.
> (I donno why /dev/?? is shown here)
That apparently means it's a swap file instead of partition.
>FYI, my MAXINE has 40MB RAM and 36MB+ dedicated swap space and I
>routinely use it for NetBSD kernel build with 4 parallel make (make -j 4).
>It seldom uses swap space, and runs as CPU/RAM speed.
Something must be terribly wrong with my machine then, since it was running
out of space with 24mb + 132mb. Is there something else the "panic:
vm_fork: no more kernel virtual memory" could mean? Should I compile
another kernel ASAP, instead of using a GENERIC one?
Now, after I added some more swap, I get these in my log:
Jan 12 20:19:08 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page 6b6000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:08 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page 7a7000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:08 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page af4000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:08 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page afd000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page a72000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page ada000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page 1780000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page b0c000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page b87000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page ac0000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page fe5000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:09 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page 16f8000 failed
Jan 12 20:19:10 eagle /netbsd: swap_pager_clean: clean of page 16dd000 failed
(more ad nauseum)
What's going on here? Is there something more drastically wrong with my
setup than a lack of RAM?
Thanks,
Adam
( Adam Fritzler afritz@iname.com )
http://afritz.base.org/