Port-pmax archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Is pmax alive?
On Tue, 10 May 2016, Felix Deichmann wrote:
> With this single instruction patched to NOP as described (now next step is to
> get the "analysis patch" running):
OK, since it looks like you can boot at least to the single user mode,
then I suggest just to sort out the buggy delay slot scheduling instead --
the trap debugging feature will be of no use here.
If people agree on removing the `.set noreorder' directive (note that it
will affect all MIPS ports, not only pmax, though the change is supposed
to be functionally neutral, which can perhaps be verified with `objdump
-d'), then I can do the grunt work and send an upstream candidate patch --
that won't be much hassle to me as that's the kind of stuff I deal with on
a daily basis. People can then put this through whatever regression
testing is required for acceptance -- regrettably while I have various
pieces of pmax hardware I'm not set up for such software testing and if I
were to deal with that, then it would only delay things unnecessarily.
Is there a preferred format for such a submission described somewhere?
Maciej
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index