Port-sgimips archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Is this SGI kit worth getting?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On May 27, 2008, at 06:36, Stephen Borrill wrote:
I've been offered an O2, an Octane and 3 Indys. The O2 is a no-
brainer especially with the recent framebuffer changes. It'll be a
worthwhile replacement for my Indigo2. However, I see the Octane is
not supported and the Indys (while cute) aren't exactly the fastest
machines.
Is the Octane ever likely to be supported?
In theory it's a pretty close relative of the O2 although we're not
all that likely to ever be able to support whatever graphics board
you stick into it. There's a Linux driver for IMPACT boards in I2s,
no idea how useful that would be for the Octane ( or if you even have
an IMPACT or something completely different )
Reminds me, I need to commit more XFree86-on-O2 stuff. It still has
issues but it works well enough to use KDE or gnome without major
issues and it uses the rendering engine for almost all XRender
operations.
have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iQEVAwUBSDwFFspnzkX8Yg2nAQKKEQgAqjqyymHVM+FL3RiHd5v4mSFHquUd6Rv+
rj7uFZr0Xj1qzJekYjDsKC2ws3wwsiaRnRJwgd3sIvnXweGl1Znetr287Xqpqnui
i8NpEryht+N3sDRBo4iZsd8RWyeK2uyQ2uKIedmV670yDzxssRRuV+iZgjxCVjeB
hiwa44eyhgH7mfgKGoo8lESj4V6mDoUIQan96mjtTRPFGDHpVKJtZ5QINEarf6Rc
4eI4oL2ZELmGjq88qyE8tTIyCipsfwAEJWRGWpTgK3wZrVmFpyVxiwFIYYJYS8G4
97EIlSbqC3N+6KLBHCcifOhnDVGlj6oW1qbpqepIcVqAd4wZerGzpw==
=KA8s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index