Re: sysarch(2) syscall to sync icache

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <20171020010932.GK6729%pony.stderr.spb.ru@localhost>,
Valery Ushakov  <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Re http://gnats.netbsd.org/52260
>
>Does attached patch look ok?  This is only the kernel part, the
>lib/libarch counterpart is mechanical.

Why not make the address argument void *? Isn't it more natural for userland?

christos