Subject: Re: Changing serial parameters.
To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@SJ.Xenotropic.COM>
From: David Gilbert <dgilbert@pci.on.ca>
List: port-sparc
Date: 11/16/1995 09:12:33
>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Thorpe <thorpej@SJ.Xenotropic.COM> writes:
[on the ZRLB change]
As a followup, I got pleanty of fifo overflows last night, but
the other end didn't quit from the number of errors. The observed
throughput is about 1-1.2K receiving... but that could be affected by
any number of problems... (plus I was using telnet, too).
If I read the code correctly, the ring will hold upto 64 bytes
of in or output as it stands (256). This is increased to 1024 with
the change to 4096. I think that the router was quitting because it
was having trouble even sending a control structure for PPP (which
could easily be more than 64 bytes) and eventually quitting.
This change seems to prevent that. I don't know if I'd want
to be using a 19.2K plain serial connection with this machine for
much. However, with PPP it is very usable.
>> The next thing that I'd like to know about this mess is whether or
>> not the priority (or somesuch) can be bumped on this thing. My
>> 68030 based Amiga manages to run 19200 w/o any loss without even
>> the help of a fifo on the serial port. Why is the Sun4 (about 2
>> times faster) having problems?
Jason> Actually, I've always been under the impression that Amiga's
Jason> had Really Buff serial ports in general...Also might be a
Jason> side-effect of the way interrupts are handled.
Not really. Single byte fifo serviced by an interrupt. The
only thing special about them is a clock that allows them to run at
the 'special' MIDI speed. On the stock systems, even with a 68030,
many serial applications have trouble at 38.4 or 56... but some work.
Jason> And, really, a 4/260 is twice as fast as an Amiga?! :-)
Well... If a 68030 put's all it's MIPS in one basket (mine
rarely does since it's a news/mail hub), then it's somewhere between 3
and 5. Something like a Sun3/260. The Sun4/260, as I understand, is
about 10 mips or so.
That said, with this graphics card and disk system, the Sun4
doesn't seem at all faster than the Amiga. I especially hate how the
machine seems to lock up under disk accesses.