Subject: Re: potential stupid question on adding disk
To: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: port-sparc
Date: 03/05/1996 13:03:04
On Mon, 4 Mar 1996 23:38:13 +0100 (MET)
Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl> wrote:
> # newfs /dev/rsd2g
> Warning: 36 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated
> /dev/rsd2g: 258840 sectors in 799 cylinders of 9 tracks, 36 sectors
> 126.4MB in 50 cyl groups (16 c/g, 2.53MB/g, 640 i/g)
> super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at:
> 32, 5264, 10496, 15728, 20960, 26192, 31424, 36656,
> 41888, 47120, 52352, 57584, 62816, 68048, 73280, 78512,
> 82976, 88208, 93440, 98672, 103904, 109136, 114368, 119600,
> 124832, 130064, 135296, 140528, 145760, 150992, 156224, 161456,
> 165920, 171152, 176384, 181616, 186848, 192080, 197312, 202544,
> 207776, 213008, 218240, 223472, 228704, 233936, 239168, 244400,
> 248864, 254096,
> newfs: ioctl (WDINFO): Invalid argument
> newfs: /dev/rsd2g: can't rewrite disk label
Don't worry about it ... this was due to some magic number frobbing that
was happening in the kernel's sunos disklabel code. I think it's been
fixed now ... but you can safely ignore the warning.
> Why does newfs want to rewrite the label? I don't have the source online
> so I cannot easily check what happens.
It wants to update the fstype...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939