Subject: Re: Better SunOS than SunOS! (and minor X11R6.1 problem)
To: James E. Bernard <jbernard@tater.mines.edu>
From: David Brownlee <david@mono.org>
List: port-sparc
Date: 05/28/1996 16:06:48
I'm running x11r6pl13 under NetBSD1.1B (Apr 2) on an IPX and the
keyrepeat has been perfect for me. There might have been a change
in x11r6.1, or in NetBSD - what date source are people with
the problem running?
David/abs (david@mono.org)
System Manager, Southern Studios, Box 59, London N22 1AR. +44 181 888 8949
http://www.mono.org ---<Monochrome>--- (** Largest UK Internet BBS **)
http://www.netbsd.org _/Free-un*x alpha,amiga,arm32,atari,hp300,i386,mac68k
http://www.openbsd.org \mvme68k,mvme88k,pc532,pica,pmax,sparc,sun3,vax,x68k
On Tue, 28 May 1996, James E. Bernard wrote:
>
> >One minor problem: I built X11R6.1 straight from the X Consortium
> >distribution, and there is no keyboard repeat in the X server, even though
> >xset says that it is turned on! This is very annoying. X11R6.1 includes
>
> I have the same problem on a couple of sparc 1's. Except, the key repeat
> isn't actually missing, it's just that the delay in initiating autorepeat
> is excessively long (approaching a minute on one system, about 5-6 sec on
> another). The -ar1 arg to the server does have an effect, but, at least on
> the one system on which I've tweaked it repeatedly, even setting it to
> 1 ms leaves the delay unacceptably large at about 1 sec. I suspected a
> simple scaling problem in the units used for the value, but found none in
> a brief perusal of the code. The apparent difference in behavior on two
> identical machines leads me to suspect something weird about the mechanism
> used to time the delay, but I won't have time to look into it further for
> a few weeks.
>
> One other thing I've noticed is that the beep function sometimes makes
> exceedingly short, almost non-existent, beeps. Other times it seems more
> or less normal.
>
> --Jim Bernard
>