>    Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 21:40:32 -0400
>    From: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@ux2.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
> 
>    This ignores the boot block problem.  Different sparc architectures
>    need different boot blocks, do they not?
> 
>    I think the single-kernel-all-architectures approach is a great one,
>    but i'm not sure that this is a good justification for it...
> 
> It is actually completely feasible.

I know, we _do_ the single-kernel-all-architectures thing.

Or, were you saying that different sparc architectures could use the
same boot blocks?


cgd