On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Curt Sampson wrote:

> That would likely still leave us open to trademark infringement,
> because `spark' is sufficiently close to `sparc,' and is used in
> a similar context, such that it would (as it's obviously intended)
> likely make people believe that we are talking about the thing
> referred to by the `Sparc' trademark.

How about NetBSD/Spork? :) If nothing else, it's a hell of a lot of fun to
say. Spork, spork, spork, spork, spork, spork, spork, spork... 
____________________________________________________________________________
Allan "Norm" Crain |  allanc@idea-inc.com  | http://web.idea-inc.com/~allanc
"We'll have fun fun fun 'till my daddy takes the T1 away" --nby@idea-inc.com