Subject: Re: Sparc lawyers prove more stupid than suns (fwd)
To: None <greywolf@starwolf.com>
From: Ari Rubenstein <arubenstein@staff.portal.ca>
List: port-sparc
Date: 06/17/1997 16:59:58
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Segmentation Violation. Core dumped. wrote:
> This is really interesting. How do they figure that the use of SPARC/sparc
> in one context is OK while the use in another context is not? Either it
> applies to all contexts or to none.
I think I'll start a company called Apple Computers, or maybe Apple
Records, no wait... maybe a roadside fruit-stand called "Apples"...
Intellectual property law is a huge murky subject I won't pretend to
understand. But I do know that context _does_ count.
You need an identifier and a specifier and all that...
So there's probably something similar going on in the crazed minds of
Sun's lawyers.
- Ari
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ari Rubenstein Internet Portal Services
arubenstein@staff.portal.ca phone: (604) 257-9400
fax: (604) 257-9401