> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Greywolf wrote:
> 
>> ...or are you talking about a kernel which loads into memory and needs
>> to suck in more than one floopy as a root fs?
> 
> Yes, that's what I'm talking about. A root fs in RAM is much nicer than
> a root FS on floppy, anyway.

Unless, of course, you don't have much RAM...

-- 
Tim Walls