Subject: Re: Ultra 1 Performance
To: None <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: David Laight <David.Laight@btinternet.com>
List: port-sparc
Date: 12/16/2001 21:34:10
I think it all depends on the number of windows lurking.....
Mind you solaris 8 (or rather CDE) does like 128M+ of memory.
My 50MHz sun4m system with 64Mb is a bit sluggish at times!
(especially running netscape)
dsl@teepee:-ksh$ ps -ylp 268
S UID PID PPID C PRI NI RSS SZ WCHAN TTY TIME CMD
S 2410 268 246 0 40 20 6400 10752 f59354fa ? 0:24 Xsun
David
----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Kelly <rmk@toad.rmkhome.com>
To: Brian Hechinger <wonko@arkham.ws>
Cc: Harald Barth <haba@pdc.kth.se>; <wysoft@hotmail.com>; <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: Ultra 1 Performance
> Brian Hechinger said:
>
> >Solaris itself doesn't need more memory. it'll run fine in 128M, it's when
> >you start up X that you run into trouble:
> >
> > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND
> > 371 root 1 48 0 95M 63M sleep 17.5H 0.19% Xsun
> >
> >95M of memory. sheesh.
>
> That's kind of odd.
>
> On an SS4 running Solaris 8:
>
> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND
> 277 root 1 59 0 27M 6640K sleep 0:16 1.61% Xsun
>
> Memory: 96M real, 46M free, 26M swap in use, 557M swap free
>
> --
> Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.com www.rmkhome.com