On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:29:58PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 9:27 PM +0200 2002/04/17, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> 
> > Just as if it was still using the old make.
> >
> > I tried a build.sh on a sparc from today's sources, and it managed to 
> > compile
> > the tools at last (I had to halt it), so I suspect there's a 
> >problem with your
> > environnement.
> 
> 	That's very weird.  I would have assumed that the various 
> build.sh scripts and sub-scripts would have hard-coded the path to 
> nbmake, so as to avoid precisely this problem.  After all, you 
> probably wouldn't want to be using these tools except for building a 
> new kernel with the new sources, and you would explicitly want to 
> make sure that this is *NOT* in your path.

really, I didn't look at what the script does exactly. Maybe it uses absolute
paths. I don't know :)

> 
> > Do you have a program called nbmake or nbmake-sparc somewhere in your 
> > PATH ?
> > can you post the content of your environnement variables (result of
> > 'env' command) ?
> 
> 	The relevant bits from the "env" command are (slightly sanitized ;-):
> 
> # env
> [..]

Well, I can't see what's wrong, sorry.
I assume you have an empty /etc/mk.conf ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--