Subject: Re: which would handle nat better
To: David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org>
From: Brian Hechinger <wonko@4amlunch.net>
List: port-sparc
Date: 09/02/2002 10:18:19
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:16:31AM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
>
> Just to be different: Use the ss2 and use raidframe to mirror
> two disks for redundancy
i don't know how different that is, that's how i setup all of my machines. :)
(and by all machines i mean NetBSD, Solaris and OpenVMS as OS)
> (disks do not need to the be same size,
> just just mirror a section the same size, and use the rest as
> ordinary scratch partitions)
there are a lot of RAID implementations that choke on doing something like this
(DiskSuite and VMS Shadow Volumes come to mind) so it's nice to see that it can
be done here. :)
-brian
--
she manipulates my language |
the scion of a cunning goddess | Fridge
and i *am* but a MAN | Magnet
watching my gratuitous torment | Poetry
not looking herculean |