> Yes, this is correct.  Only I'd move BUS_ADDR_PADDR before the
> preceding "if" that tests for CPUTYP_4_100.

OK.  I'll do that.  Thanks.

> Unfortunately, after bus_addr_t has been promoted to 64-bit we have
> inconsistent names in arch/sparc when things that are bus_addr_t are
> named paddr.

Yes.  I guess there's not much point in renaming them all.  From a quick look,
only zs.c has problems.

J

-- 
                    My other computer also runs NetBSD
                          http://www.netbsd.org/