Subject: Re: Performances ?
To: None <port-sparc@netbsd.org>
From: Bernd Sieker <bsieker@freenet.de>
List: port-sparc
Date: 11/27/2003 21:16:04
On 27.11.03, 19:55:42, Laurent FAILLIE wrote:
> --- matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> a ?crit : >
>
> > there are several options. for sparc, it depends on
> > the exact
> > cpu. for the SS5/110, that's a microsparcII cpu...
> > hmm there
> > appears to be no special flags for that, just -mv8.
> > for the
> > ultra5, try "-mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc"
>
>
> Arg, my SS5 just finished : GCC 2.95.3 as previously
> but w/ -mv8 -> 45h18 :-(((( It's worst :-(
> I will try now using GCC3
Is that a 110MHz model? That's strange, I submitted a result to
the official benchmark site of a 85MHz SPARCstation 4, and it "only"
took 49:39:19. It's currently ranked 206 out of 207 on the official
site. (http://www.haveland.com/index.htm?povbench/index.php).
Btw., rank 207 is also one of my NetBSD machines, a HP 9000/433t,
33MHz Motorola 68040. It took 192:42:08(!).
I shall soon also benchmark my Amiga (40MHz 68040). I will refrain from
benchmarking the IBM z50 (subnotebook running NetBSD/hpcmips), which
lacks an FPU and will probably take several thousand hours.
>
> Bye
>
> Lolo
>
--
Bernd Sieker
NetBSD: Resistance is NOT futile!
-- Hubert Feyrer