Subject: Re: sparc/conf/GENERIC_SUN4U -> sparc64 ?
To: None <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.demon.co.uk>
List: port-sparc
Date: 10/01/2004 00:56:12
matthew green wrote:
>the reason it's done the way it is today is that the sparc and sparc64
>ports are separate - we have arch/sparc and arch/sparc64, and that name
>has traditionally always been the $MACHINE in netbsd, so way back when
>we chose to always use "sparc64" on sun4u machines, and let $MACHINE_ARCH
>be used for deciding the native binary format.

As a comparison, what happens if you run arch/i386 on an AMD64 machine ?

Robert Swindells