Subject: Re: sh problems with 2.0.2
To: Michael <macallan18@earthlink.net>
From: Bruce O'Neel <edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org>
List: port-sparc
Date: 05/10/2005 18:25:26
Hi,
Thanks, I'll try building a current and see how it goes.
I, sadly, was not sucessful with SH=/bin/ksh in mk.conf. Nor
did moving sh aside and ln ksh sh.
Thanks!
cheers
bruce
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:44:19PM -0400, Michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I already deleted the mail message so I can't just reply, but, this is
> > a "me too." I have a SS 4/110mhz and 2.0.2's sh is mostly useless for
> > scripts. It just cores. 2.0's worked fine, and 1.6.2's worked fine
> > as well. Sh is so bad that I can't install anything from pkgsrc
> > since pkg_tools won't make without sh coring.
>
> /should/ be fixed in -current, SH=/bin/ksh in mk.conf allows most
> packages to build.
>
> have fun
> Michael
--
edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org