Subject: Re: individual hme sbus cards vs quad hme sbus cards
To: doomwarrior <doomwarriorx@gmail.com>
From: Bruce O'Neel <edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org>
List: port-sparc
Date: 08/12/2006 18:51:56
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:00:53PM +0200, doomwarrior wrote:
<snip>
>
> so i start my apache on the 'sparky' and wget from my pc, first with
> le0, second with the hme0
>
> 96.419.840 876.52K/s ETA 00:00
> 96.419.840 2.13M/s ETA 00:00
>
> only 2Megs per seconds. I thourghed I would get at least a boost to
> 5Megs or so. What can I do to speed up the system to (at least)
> 3Megs, because I want to upgrade to a faster internet connection,
> without changing my lovely 'sparky'.
I've never been able to get more than 2 some meg/secs through a hme on
a ss20 when the data is going into user space (say via ftp, wget,
etc). I have, when running OpenBSD and bridging across the different
interfaces on a quad hme card in a SS20, gotten two Ultras talking at
4-5 meg/sec. This pretty much pegs the SS20. If your firewall
doesn't do too much you might be able to get the SS20 to move 3meg/sec
between two hme cards.
With my collection of SS20s and Mbus cards I've found that:
- 180mhz Hypersparcs are the fastest in raw CPU. That said they don't
do such a good job with i/o and things go downhill fast i/o wise when
you have 2 of them. My guess here is that the mbus gets saturated
talking to memory.
- 85mhz SuperSparc IIs are quite fast i/o wise. The big cache might
help.
- 133 and 142mhz Hypersparcs are also fast, and, i/o wise, seem faster
than the 180mhz ones. The 142s with the 1meg of cache are very
pleasing to work with, but, they also put out a bit of heat.
cheers
bruce
--
edoneel@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org