Re: sigpending

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:06:05PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer a écrit :
> >On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:23:04PM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> >>    Hello,
> >>
> >>    I have written a subroutine that perfectly work on several Unices 
> >>(Solaris, Linux, Tru64, HP-UX). This subroutine can be compiled on 
> >>NetBSD 4.0 without any error, but doesn't work. I have done some test 
> >>and I have see that sigsuspend seems to return 0 even if a signal is 
> >>caught. I have seen that sigsuspend doesn't work in NetBSD 3.1, but I 
> >>haven't found any information about sigsuspend on NetBSD 4.0. Any news ?
> >
> >sigsuspend seems to work fine for me, on both NetBSD 3.1 and 4.0, using
> >the test program below (that is, sigsuspend returns -1 when SIGUSR1
> >is sent to the process)
> 
>       Sorry, not sigsuspend, sigpending. Sigsuspend works fine.

Hum. When you says it always returns 0, do you mean the integer returned
by the function, or the sigset_t passed as pointer ?
Reading the man page it seems OK for the function to always return 0.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--