Port-sparc archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ntpd wedged by libc?



On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:40:46AM -0800, AGC wrote:
> Seems I'm still having issues with libc on 5.1/sparc specifically with 
> ntpd wedging when doing math:
> 
> #0  0x103d38c8 in __pow5mult_D2A () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
> #1  0x103d3ac4 in __muldi3 () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
> #2  0x103d34dc in __mult_D2A () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
> #3  0x103d3728 in __pow5mult_D2A () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
> #4  0x103c61d4 in __dtoa () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
> #5  0x103c315c in __vfprintf_unlocked () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
> #6  0x103330c4 in snprintf () from /usr/lib/libc.so.12
> #7  0x000256f4 in ctl_putdblf (tag=0x87d79 "", fmt=0x88458 "%.3f", 
> d=4.5623779296875)
>     at ntp_control.c:1431
> #8  0x00025ed0 in ctl_putpeer (id=14, p=0xb1bc0) at ntp_control.c:2459
> #9  0x0002adbc in read_variables (rbufp=0x10522000, restrict_mask=0) at 
> ntp_control.c:2981
> #10 0x00028798 in process_control (rbufp=0x10522000, restrict_mask=0) at 
> ntp_control.c:1121
> #11 0x00038150 in receive (rbufp=0x10522000) at ntp_proto.c:417
> #12 0x0002323c in ntpdmain (argc=0, argv=0xefffe8a8) at ntpd.c:1069
> #13 0x000138bc in ___start ()
> #14 0x000137f4 in _start ()
> 
> 
> Ideas anyone?

Wasn't there some silly fubar bug in dtoa() ??

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index