Subject: re: 1.6 self-hosting?
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 07/19/2002 18:46:34
I'm updating sources as I type this, and once that's done I'll try
again. I suppose what I'm really wondering is, are such things worth
mentioning, either on the list or with send-pr, or are problems
building sparc64 on sparc64 still "don't do that, then"?
for a long while now, i have regularly built sparc64 both native
and cross, using the in tree compiler. if it doesn't work then
it is a bug that should be reported..
.mrg.