On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:28:46AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > but as we now have atabus between the
> > controller driver and wd, maybe we could use that instead to avoid
> > growing bus_class_tab[] too much.
> 
> >From a very quick glance it's unclear to me why the dev_compatible checks
> on PCI subclasses don't fire:
> 
>                 case PCI_CLASS_MASS_STORAGE:
>                         if (PCI_SUBCLASS(pa->pa_class) ==
>                                 PCI_SUBCLASS_MASS_STORAGE_IDE) {
> 
> If this could be made to catch this case, we wouldn't need the table for it;
> or are vendors just lacking to fill in proper info here?

Some vendors (e.g. HPT or promise) use PCI_SUBCLASS_MASS_STORAGE_RAID instead
of PCI_SUBCLASS_MASS_STORAGE_IDE, for their adapters with a RAID BIOS.
But I don't think this would affects the sparc64 port.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--