Subject: Re: Re: AW [2]: RASTERCONSOLE still broken (for 1.6.2 and -current)?
To: Timo =?iso-8859-15?Q?Sch=F6ler?= <timo.schoeler@macfinity.net>
From: Joel CARNAT <joel@carnat.net>
List: port-sparc64
Date: 06/03/2004 19:42:39
On Thu, Jun 03 2004 - 19:12, Timo Sch?ler wrote:
> >I did compile a kernel with RASTERCONSOLE (and ffb) support yesterday
> >on a Ultra5 running NetBSD-2.0-BETA and it compiled and rebooted OK.
> >The only things are :
>
> mine on ultra 1 and ultra 2, both 1.6.2 -- did not reboot yet (they're
> kind of 'production systems' ;)
>
you're not living on the edge ;p
> >
> >-> I don't see any differences (still a beautiful 80x25 black on white
> >console on my 21" :)
>
> what about the output speed? that *is* for me the main reason to try
> RASTERCONSOLE, as it claims to speed up this very lame thing (as statet
> in the kernel config file)...
>
hum... won't be able to say... that was not the thing I was seeking ;)
if it got faster, it wasn't that much...
I'll have a more precise look at the difference ASAP
> >-> "ATI rage pro" is still "unconfigured".
> > I don't know if it's off-topic, but shouldn't it be recognised ?
> > I saw you're (andrey) FTP session with U2 and U30 config file
> >supporting the ffb so I thought my U5 would work :'(
> > On OpenBSD 3.5, the video card work and is known as vgafb0...
> > What is the state of the ffb ? still unsupported (as stated in
> >sparc64 FAQ) ?
>
> tried it on an ultra 10 months ago, but i did not have that much time
> to play with it.
>
did you try "startx" ?
did it start anything ?
Jo