Re: Using %stick where available

[Takeshi Nakayama <tn%catvmics.ne.jp@localhost>]

>>> matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost> wrote

> 
> > >   rd      SOFTINT, %g1
> > > - btst    1, %g1
> > > + mov     1, %g5
> > > + sllx    %g5, 16, %g3
> > > + or      %g5, %g3, %g5
> > 
> > Only "set 0x1001, %g5" is faster.
> 
> oh much better than mine :-)

No, "set" is synonym of "sethi/or" sequence.  So it's same to your
suggestion.  (except for confusing typo. 0x1001 -> 0x10001 :-)

-- Takeshi Nakayama