Re: V240 Status?

["J. Hannken-Illjes" <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost>]

On Jan 21, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> 
wrote:

> Hmm, I don't get very far on a U2:
> 
> # fssconfig -c -x -v fss0 /mnt /mnt/snap0
> trap type 0x60: cpu 1, pc=10f08f0 npc=10f08f4 
> pstate=0xffffffffff82000e<AM,PRIV,IE>
> kernel trap 60: +interrupt vector
> Stopped in pid 0.16 (system) at netbsd:kpreempt_disable+0x10:   ld            
>   [
> %g2 + 0x14c], %l0
> db{1}> bt        
> mutex_exit(59508000, 0, 0, 0, 1009fd8, badcafe) at netbsd:mutex_exit+0x15c
> sched_curcpu_runnable_p(12b0ea0, 0, 10cdc78, 0, 0, 1) at 
> netbsd:sched_curcpu_run
> nable_p+0x4                                                                   
>  
> idle_loop(12c18f0, 12c1870, 12c18b0, 12b55c8, 12c18c0, 12c18d0) at 
> netbsd:idle_l
> oop+0x1f0                                                                     
>  


So its not V240 specific.  As high priority calls are rare (only subr_pcu.c,
and NPF through subr_pserialize.c used it so far) it is quite possible they
were never tested.

--
J. Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig 
(Germany)