Re: Someone using COMPAT_SVR4(_32) ?

[Jerome Ibanes <jibanes%gmail.com@localhost>]

Then it's likely that one of the changes between the 5 and 6 branches broke
compat_svr4, other than going through each patch in arch/sparc64 and running
a test on 6.0.x; which other option do you suggest to narrow this down?


Jerome

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:01:14AM +0200, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> 6.0.6 sparc64, 6.1.5 sparc64, 7.1 sparc64 (all GENERIC), fail with the same
>> behavior (meaning, same ktrace ouput) given the same payload (sparc
>> solaris 2.6), ktrace shows:
>
> OK, 7.1 definitively has the fix I was thinking about, so this is something
> else.
>
> Martin