Gordon W. Ross said:

>No, I think it would make more sense to build an INSTALL kernel
>that does not have so much bloat as GENERIC does.  GENERIC will
>almost fit as it is, so it should be easy to slim it down.  We
>can do without: SYSVMSG, SYSVSEM, SYSVSHM, KTRACE, UNION, PROCFS,
>NFSSERVER, (and probably lots of other things).  I guess I sould
>do that for the 1.3.1 patch release (for 3/50 support).

I agree, this makes a lot sense. A minimum GENERIC kernel that will
suffice for installation of the OS.

I would do a snapshot on a 3/60, but I don't have one running 1.3
right now.
-- 
Rick Kelly	rmk@rmkhome.com	    rmk@tencats.rmkhome.com
                http://tencats.rmkhome.com
		http://warthog.rmkhome.com