If you want to compile a -cuurent sun3 snapshot I'm more
	than willing to get it uploaded to ftp.netbsd.org for you :)

		David/absolute

                  -=- Why _do_ we crucify ourselves?  -=-

On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, J. Maynard Gelinas wrote:

>     Boy, it sure would have saved me some time if I'd had recent binaries 
> to install instead of having to figure out lib and kernel dependency 
> issues by asking stupid questions on the list.  :-^  <*cough!*>
> 
>     Unless 1.3.3 supports the new 1.3I UVM kernel I'd recommend to Robert
> that he just recompile to -current.  I had poor results with 1.3.2 and the
> distribution kernel, and anyway it doesn't support a color framebuffer.
> I'm just going to recompile everything up to -current... Maybe I should
> arrange to upload the binaries to incoming?  I notice there's no -current 
> release for the 3 or 3x over at ftp.netbsd.org.
> 
> > 	I would expet it means the person who comitted to buulding the
> > 	sun3 images did not manage to complete the build in time.
> > 
> > 	I wqould definitely expect there to be a sun3 entry in the 1.4
> > 	release (whenever that comes). In the meantime 1.3.2 is probably
> > 	your best bet.
> > 
> > 		David/absolute
> > 
> >           -=-  "Give me one last video, just dressed in black"  -=-
> > 
> > On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Robert D. Keys wrote:
> > 
> > > Is there a sun-3 port for the NetBSD-1.3.3?  I did not see such a tree
> > > in the archives.  Does that mean there won't be a sun3 port?
> > > 
> > > Bob Keys
> > > 
> > 
> 
>