Subject: RE: Port to Sun 386i
To: Curtis H. Wilbar Jr. <bsd@hawkmountain.net>
From: Zach Lowry <zach@zachlowry.net>
List: port-sun3
Date: 06/24/2003 13:12:51
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
My cable is indeed a bit flaky. Is there a good way on these machines
to disable the keyboard completely so it'll pass the self-tests, and
I can use Serial Console only?
Zach Lowry || Murfreesboro, TN || www.zachlowry.net
Linux / *BSD / Irix / Solaris / Apple / Unix Network Administration
Registered Linux User #264589
14 Different NetBSD-Supported Machines
> -----Original Message-----
> From: port-sun3-owner@netbsd.org
> [mailto:port-sun3-owner@netbsd.org]On Behalf Of Curtis H. Wilbar
> Jr.
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:58 PM
> To: port-sun3@netbsd.org
> Subject: RE: Port to Sun 386i
>
>
>
> Nice grab on the docs.... I had a complete doc set (including all
> the man pages, document rack, etc). However, that was when I
> worked at Sun, and despite the fact that I saved it from the trash,
> I didn't get it out of there before I left.... and my manager would
> not let me take it because I admitted it was Sun property..... I'm
> sure it went into the recycle bin less than a week after I left
> :-(.
>
> I have a -150 and two -250 386i systems. I also have a 486i
> system.
>
> Time permitting, I can test things out ... well... if I can find
> my 386i keyboard/mouse/monitor cable setup.... I think I only have
> one... possibly two... for 4 systems :-(.
>
> -- Curt
>
> >Delivered-To: port-sun3@netbsd.org
> >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=8.0
> >From: "Zach Lowry" <zach@zachlowry.net>
> >To: "David Brownlee" <abs@netbsd.org>
> >Cc: <port-i386@netbsd.org>, <port-sun3@netbsd.org>,
> <netbsd-ports@netbsd.org>
> >Subject: RE: Port to Sun 386i
> >Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 22:38:54 -0500
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> >Importance: Normal
> >
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >I got my 386i today. It's a -250 model, complete with Hi-res Color
> >FB and a single memory board, whichever one the -250 came with. I
> >also got a reportedly somewhat flaky video/keyboard cable and a
> >20" Color Sun Monitor.
> >
> >The real prize, however, is in the documentation.
> >
> >Sun386i man Pages Supplement (December 1988)
> >Sun386i Owner's Notes
> >Sun386i Administrator's and Developer's Notes
> >Field Service Notes
> >Sun386i Owver's Bulletin SunOS release 4.0.1
> >Installing Sun386i SunOS 4.0.1
> >Sun386i Configuration Guide (February 1989)
> >Replacement Pages for the Sun386i Developer's Guide
> >Sun386i Developer's Guide (May 1988)
> >Sun386i SNAP Administration
> >Sun386i Advanced Administration (June 1988)
> >Sun386i Advanced Administration (February 1989)
> >Sun386i Administration Cookbook
> >
> >Will be reading and having fun with this guy, and hopefully
> >someone else out there can test on a -150.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Zach Lowry || Murfreesboro, TN || www.zachlowry.net
> >Linux / *BSD / Irix / Solaris / Apple / Unix Network
> >Administration
> >
> >Registered Linux User #264589
> >14 Different NetBSD-Supported Machines
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: netbsd-ports-owner@netbsd.org
> >> [mailto:netbsd-ports-owner@netbsd.org]On Behalf Of David
> >> Brownlee Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:18 PM
> >> To: Zach Lowry
> >> Cc: port-i386@netbsd.org; port-sun3@netbsd.org;
> >> netbsd-ports@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Port to Sun 386i
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Zach Lowry wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am soon to recieve a Sun 386i, which I notice has not been
> >> > ported to yet. Since for the past little bit I've been
> >> > acquainting myself with my Sun 3/60 and 3/80s, I feel
> >> > comfortable saying that I intend to port NetBSD to this unique
> >> > machine.
> >> >
> >> Excellent news - do you know if its a 150 or 250 (the 250 had
> >> had max 16M rather than 8M and had IIRC an extra cache)
> >>
> >> > I'm looking for advice, however, since I've bever done this
> >> > sort of thing before. Would it be best to start with the i386
> >> > port, remove all devices except those explicitly available in
> >> > the 386i and then merge drivers for Framebuffers and the like
> >> > from the sun3 port? From what I understand, the normal color
> >> > and B&W framebuffers on the 386i correspond to the cg3 and
> >> > bw2, but additionally there exists a cg5 card and a VGA card
> >> > for DOS emulation under SunOS.
> >>
> >> That would make sense - probably start with either using
> >> the PROM console or serial console to minimise the amount
> >> of driver writing to getting something booting.
> >>
> >> > I'm also aware that there existed memory add-ons in the form
> >> > of ISA cards, could anyone clarify on these boards, and would
> >> > it be possible to support them?
> >>
> >> I don't remember any ISA memory boards, but it _should_ be
> >> possible to support standard ISA boards, possible DMA
> >> considerations notwithstanding :)
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype
> >> required --
> >>
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: PGP 7.0.4
> >
> >iQA/AwUBPvfGVYHWQmQc5olOEQLIigCeJMn5oVfR+3N5n4M8Mv97obFL8jMAnAm/
> >F/fVctcfPUHHHHjMa9Bo6WiB
> >=1xDl
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4
iQA/AwUBPviSbIHWQmQc5olOEQI8JwCfUQ+7vtTFg2Bp5yyiNjhNbtRllIYAoOC8
5qcd+AqMdraJ+xBIDIcSJSh2
=QdUp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----