Subject: Re: Vaxstation/MicroVAX info
To: Tim Shoppa <shoppa@alph01.triumf.ca>
From: Arno Griffioen <arno@usn.nl>
List: port-vax
Date: 01/25/1998 20:05:37
> "BA" in a DEC part number usually implies some sort of box. Usually,
> it's a box with a bus backplane. The BA213 is a Q-bus backplane, also
> commonly referred to as a "skunk box" (modules intended for use in a
> BA213 often have a S suffix). Your PDP-11/03 is probably in a BA11-N
> or a BA11-S Q-bus backplane.
Yes, you are absolutely correct.. Sorry for that..
The (original) DEC manual was a bit unclear on the matter and
designated the entire box as BA213
> DEC racks usually begin with a "H" (doesn't narrow things down much -
> a huge number of non-rack products also have "H" part numbers, such as
> power supplies. Of course, the power supplies were originally bolted
> to the rack and independent of the backplane...)
Yup..
H9644 for the rack
> > The RA82 sucks 4A of that, so the QBUS chassis is rated at 1.9A
> > (no labels on the QBUS part..)
>
> This doesn't sound like a BA213 power rating at all. My BA213 has
> stickers on the front and sides saying "BA213, 100-120V,
> 10.2A". Divide that by two for your power supply voltage and that's
> still substantially more than 1.9A.
Hmm.. I examined the (broken) BA213 I have here as well and you're right..
This ne does have a label and it mentions 4.7A at 230V
Strange.. Whay did DEC put a label on the H9644 with 230V 5.9A when it
includes the RA82 which (according to it's label) is rated for
220-240V 4A and the BA213 at 4.7A? Weird..
> And a RA82 sucks much more than 4A on spin-up!
Definitely...
Bye Arno.
--
Internet Exchange Europe B.V.Fax: +31-70-3630470 | One disk to rule them all,
Lange Voorhout 9 Tel: +31-70-3600379 | One disk to bind them,
2514EA Den Haag +--------------------------------+ One disk to hold the files
The Netherlands | * END OF TRANSMISSION * | And in the darkness grind 'em