Subject: Re: SCSI on Q-bus
To: Andy Sporner <asporner@eagle.ibc.edu>
From: Brian D Chase <bdc@world.std.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 02/05/1998 20:37:35
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Andy Sporner wrote:
> Second, it seems funny that the people that are advocating NFS mounted
> ROOT filesystems and NFS Swap seem to be the same people against IDE
> drive!? What is wrong here?
Well don't count me in that group. I'm all for diskless workstations from
a convenience standpoint, performance is weak. But I'm definitely for an
IDE Q-bus card. I think SCSI has it's technical merits, but I think a
brain-dead PIO IDE controller is completely acceptable. It'd be a great
way to test run the possibility of creating Q-bus cards within the
port-vax group. I'm sort of skeptical that we can actually create a
useable card cheaply. But if we can do IDE, then maybe we can consider
moving on to bigger and better things like SCSI... or hell, maybe even a
new ethernet device... Or a SCSI/IDE/ethernet combo controller... Or how
about a simple graphics board that we can actually code a driver for, and
that would drive a standard SVGA monitor :-)
-brian.
---
Brian "JARAI" Chase | http://world.std.com/~bdc/ | VAXZilla LIVES!!!