Subject: Re: New virtual bus.
To: Lord Isildur <mrfusion@crue.jdwarren.com>
From: Anders Magnusson <ragge@ludd.luth.se>
List: port-vax
Date: 07/13/1999 22:49:00
[...]
>
> i dont see why we should create another layer to put between nexi and
> anything. a SHAC is at the same level and the same privilege as the bus
> adapetors.
>
That's what I'm (trying to) propose :-)
mvbus is the top-level of a microvax.
sgec, shac and uba is attached to the mvbus.
In the same way as sbi is the top level on a 780, or cmi on a 750,
or vsbus on all vaxstations.
The "mainbus" is just the union of all vaxen, and used just as a
carrier for all top-level buses. Mainbus only have buses attached to it,
not devices.
-- Ragge