Subject: Re: Forget VUPs how about KCUs
To: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@mcmanis.com>
From: Brian Chase <bdc@world.std.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 02/06/2000 11:47:07
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Chuck McManis wrote:
> It occurs to me that a better "metric" for this group might be "KCU"s or
> "Kernel Compile Units" This could be defined as "The time it takes to do
> 'make depend; make' in the GENERIC directory." If we assume that the
> MicroVAX II is 1.0 KCU then we can rate machines in terms of their
> suitability for development :-)
But the performance will also be dependent on the controller+disk being
used, the amount of RAM, and even the kernel you're running. We'd have to
specify more than just the CPU type for the baseline rating.
-brian.
--- Brian Chase | bdc@world.std.com | http://world.std.com/~bdc/ -----
Do you connect all the night stars into one big constellation named
"THE THING THAT'S TRYING TO BITE ME IN THE FOREHEAD WITH
ITS 57,238 TEETH"? -- K.