Subject: Re: Slightly Off-Topic...
To: Vance Dereksen <vance@ikickass.org>
From: Clint Wolff \(VAX collector\) <vaxman@qwest.net>
List: port-vax
Date: 06/25/2001 20:52:10
According to "Digital Technical Journal" Number 2 they started in
the uVAX II system started customer field tests in "early spring 1985"
Piece of what?
Clint
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Vance Dereksen wrote:
>
> What year did the 78032 VAX come out?
>
> Peace... Sridhar
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Dave McGuire wrote:
>
> > On June 25, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > > > Intel hasn't produced a decent design since the 8085, but the people
> > >
> > > You call the 8085 "decent"?!?!?!? It wasn't even close to decent!!!
> > > They've all been hacks ever since the 4004!
> >
> > Ahh, good flame bait. ;) I'll just say this: I like the 8085.
> >
> > > I think *every* other microprocessor design ever done (except maybe the
> > > silly little 6502 that I so dearly loved) was better than anything Intel
> >
> > Good lord, the 6502? I actually like to have some REGISTERS in my
> > processors, thank you. ;)
> >
> > > ever came up with. Of course I liked the RCA1802 once I figured it out,
> > > so what do I know! ;-)
> >
> > Yes, the 1802 is very interesting, isn't it?
> >
> > > Now if Western Electric were still building real CPUs they might even
> > > have given the Alpha a run for its money.... Before WE32000's made it
> > > onto a single die though the National Semi CPUs were the most awsome!
> >
> > Yes, but those were some WEIRD designs.
> >
> > > Of course they all paid homage back to the VAX....
> >
> > ...which is newer than most of the processors that we discussed
> > above, strangely enough.
> >
> > -Dave McGuire
> >
>
>
>